Oct 09 1998 Subject: R-12, classic cars and the ozone layer Freon (CFC's) and the Ozone Layer Owners of air conditioned classic cars designed to use R-12 refrigerant are having a tough time keeping their cool these days. The price of R-12 is approaching $25 a pound and converting older A\C systems to use the new R-134a refrigerant can be prohibitively expensive. So we're left with a choice of taking a hard hit in the wallet or sweltering in the heat. Are we really in danger of increased ultraviolet radiation due to ozone layer damage from CFC's? The government mandated phase-out of CFC refrigerants is based on this theory but much of the information in circulation on this subject is quite misleading and some of it is just flat wrong. First off, what is the ozone layer and how is it supposedly damaged by CFC's? Ozone is made of 3 atoms of oxygen that have joined up to form a molecule. (O3) In the stratosphere, molecules of ordinary oxygen (O2) absorb photons of ultraviolet light from the sun and are converted to ozone. Ozone strongly absorbs UV light and protects living things below on the surface from damage. The ozone layer is formed and maintained by the sun. The important thing to grasp is that the sun produces ozone. If, by some magic, ALL the ozone were to disappear NOW...a new ozone layer would be formed by the sun's action on atmospheric O2 in a matter of days. How do CFC's damage the ozone layer? Let's take a look at how the damage is done. Chlorine monoxide is the culprit. A single molecule of chlorine monoxide can split tens of thousands of ozone molecules. This much is absolutely true. It's where the chlorine monoxide comes from that is the subject of controversy. How do CFC's which are many times heavier than air get high into the stratosphere in the first place? The plain truth is...most of it doesn't! When CFC's are released into the air, they immediately seek the lowest level available and stay there for the most part. Since CFC's are extremely stable, they remain in their non-toxic, non-ozone damaging form for a very long time. The only possible way for such a heavy molecule to ever reach the stratosphere is to be carried aloft on a violent updraft such as occurs in thunderstorms. The few CFC molecules that actually do reach the ozone layer account for a very small percentage of all the chlorine monoxide found in the stratosphere. So where does the rest come from? There are several sources and we'll look at them one at a time. VOLCANOS: Volcanos account for about 30% of atmospheric chlorine monoxide. The Mt. Pinatubo eruption in the early 90's released vast quantities of chlorine monoxide into the atmosphere, probably more than that contained in all the CFC's manufactured to that date. SEAWATER: The sea covers about 70 percent of Earth's surface. Seawater contains sodium chloride - common salt. The wave action from all the world's coastlines produces a very fine spray. Some of the very tiny spray droplets evaporate leaving crystals of salt suspended in the air. The really small ones can float in the atmosphere for decades and, eventually, reach the upper atmosphere. Here, water vapor condenses on the salt crystals to form tiny salt water droplets. Exposed to UV light, they split to become atoms of chlorine and sodium. The chlorine atoms pick up oxygen atoms from the atmosphere and are converted into chlorine monoxide. Each chlorine monoxide molecule can destroy thousands of ozone molecules. Volcanos erupt from time to time but the sea never sleeps. Chlorine monoxide from seawater probably accounts for about 70 percent of that found in the stratosphere. SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCHES: Volcanos and seawater account for the vast majority of chlorine monoxide found in the stratosphere, but there are other contributors as well. The space shuttle's main engines burn liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The exhaust product is mainly water and has no detrimental effect on the ozone layer, but the boosters are a different story. The solid fuel boosters belch out vast quantities of chlorine compounds and they bore directly through the stratosphere with every launch and so deliver the nasty stuff right where it will do the most harm. The space shuttle program probably does more to damage the ozone layer than all the leaking air conditioners in the country but we (the users of CFC refrigerants) are the ones who get the blame and have to pay the price. It just ain't fair. SO WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT? There are several R-12 substitutes available, the most common is a mixture of 60% iso-butane and 40% propane. It is compatible with all mineral based compressor oils and can be mixed with R-12 in any combination. This substitute (commonly known as Hot Shot) works well in systems designed for R-12 but is quite flammable and could present a fire hazard in the event of a head-on collision. Use of a flammable R-12 substitute could also present a hazard for service personal using R-12 recovery equipment. Also, it may be illegal in some states. Anyone considering the use of a flammable substitute should be aware of the danger involved and clearly mark any system containing a flammable substance to warn A\C service personal that may need to work on the vehicle in the future. Personally, I have been using pure propane as an R-12 substitute for over 15 years with excellent results. Pure propane runs about 20 degrees colder in the evaporator and about 40 degrees hotter in the condenser. Also pressures on both the high side and low side run a bit higher. Typically, the low side pressure will be about 50 psi and high side pressure will run at about 300 psi depending on outside air temperature. I have had some reports of newer rotary compressors failing in service while using propane. The plastic vanes can't take the higher temperatures and melt. Running these compressors about 1\2 to 1 pound low seems to solve the heat problem. Older piston type compressors use metal reed valves and have no problem with the additional heat. Propane (common torch gas) is cheap, convenient, and available everywhere. A modified propane torch can be used to charge propane into an A\C system. (An illustration is available at my website - link is posted below) Propane can only be used in systems designed for R-12. Propane cannot be used in systems designed for R-22 or R-134a No inexperienced person ever should attempt repairs on any air conditioning system. If in doubt, please seek the help of a qualified professional. The bottom line is R-12 substitutes do work and for the classic car collector experienced in A\C repairs, it could be a viable option. Comments invited. John Young HTTP://www.prelube.com