+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 33 of 33

Thread: Fabbing up a rear sway bar for a Lark

  1. #1
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lincoln, NE, USA.
    Posts
    798

    Fabbing up a rear sway bar for a Lark

    I had a thought over the weekwnd about suspension modification after reading Sals instructions on how to adapt a front sway from an 84 Olds in a recent thread and after following an Escalade and later a Ram truck in our Christmas eve trip to church and back.

    I know that you can get a rear swaybar kit from Tbow and one may be able to salvage one from a late 50s Commander or President but has anyone ever built a rear swaybar for a Lark from parts salvage from the local pick-n-pull?

    I didn't find anything when I searched the archived threads

    Jeff T.
    \"I\'m getting nowhere as fast as I can\"
    The Replacements.

  2. #2
    Silver Hawk Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA, USA.
    Posts
    7,540
    Most of the full-size pickup rear bars I've seen would be way heavy/stiff for a Stude. Also many of them bolt the bar to the rear axle, adding unsprung weight. We want a bar bolted to the frame with links down to the axle.

    jack vines
    PackardV8

  3. #3
    President Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, USA.
    Posts
    4,145
    3rd and 4th Gen Camaros bolt the bar to the axle with links to the body. I dont think another
    20 pounds will cause any serious issues with a solid axle car. You have to consider the weight
    of the vehicle, and if you decide to adapt one, find a CAR in a similar weight, and add a front
    bar which matches the rear. As with the Olds, I woulod look into what bar they used in the
    rear, the size the the attachment .. though I think they had trailing arms. Maybe a 2nd Gen
    Camaro, Nova or Mustang?

    Tom
    '63 Avanti R1, '03 Mustang Cobra 13" front disc/98 GT rear brakes, 03 Cobra 17" wheels, GM alt, 97 Z28 leather seats, TKO 5-spd, Ported heads w/SST full flow valves.
    Check out my disc brake adapters to install 1994-2004 Mustang disc brakes on your Studebaker!!
    https://forum.studebakerdriversclub.c...bracket-update
    I have also written many TECH how to articles, do a search for my Forum name to find them

  4. #4
    President Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA, USA.
    Posts
    4,707
    The rear bars that I've looked at are from the mid size and small size SUVs from the 80s and 90s. S10 Blazers, Ford Bronco 2, and even some of the early Explorers. Small narrow rear bars are all you will need as the weight bias in any Stude will be heavy front. Almost 60/40 for Larks.
    sals54

  5. #5
    President Member ROADRACELARK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Auburn, Georgia (N.E.of Atlanta)
    Posts
    1,562
    Jeff,

    I agree with Sal on the weight bias for Larks. I have a rear bar from a 57-58 President sedan on the 64 Challenger below and it works great. The best part it was free and easy to install. Urethane bushings can be found at most parts stores....take the old ones to match. Hope this helps.

    Dan Miller
    Auburn, GA

    Road Racers turn left AND right.

  6. #6
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lincoln, NE, USA.
    Posts
    798
    I would love to get ahold of a rear swaybar out of a 57-58 Presdent but how many 57-58 President parts cars are out there? That being said, does anyone out there have a President parts car with said sway bar

    With my low budget, I'll have to check S10 blazers, bronco2s and perhaps some smaller cherokees to see what I can adapt

    Nothing worth doing is ever easy

    Jeff T.
    \"I\'m getting nowhere as fast as I can\"
    The Replacements.

  7. #7
    President Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA, USA.
    Posts
    4,707
    I can't remember which SUVs they are, but some of them have nice universal style clamps that bolt to the rear axle. Making up the end links would be a breeze after that. I like the rear bars that have the hump that goes over the rear end pumpkin. Gets it up and out of the way. Good luck with your project. Share the pix when you get them.
    sals54

  8. #8
    Champion Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Oskaloosa, Kansas, USA.
    Posts
    19
    I know my '50 is a bit different than larks and the like, but my '64 has a very similar width as the 50. I have a 90's vitage camero rear sway bar but it is far to wide for the stude frames. What I have found that looks to be a great fit (haven't installed yet) is a turn of the century Crown Victoria rear sway bar. My ford bar is from a police intercepter, but im sure that civilain crown vics have a similar setup. The bar hangs on the axle as mentioned above. It looks like with some simple angle iron brackets bolted to the inside of the frame and some new links, the ford bar should work well. Food for thought!
    Brad
    KD0FRQ

    1950 Champion
    1964 Cruiser
    1946 M16

  9. #9
    Golden Hawk Member DEEPNHOCK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brooklet, GA, USA. Planet Earth
    Posts
    17,505
    I put a Jeep Wrangler rear sway bar on with bolt on diff mount brackets off of a Ford Ranger pickup.
    All junkyard stuff. Cost $50 total.
    That was a while ago, but all the pieces were easy to get off with hand tools.
    HTIH (Hope The Info Helps)

    Jeff




    Note: SDC# 070190 (and earlier...)

  10. #10
    President Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, USA.
    Posts
    4,145
    Quote Originally Posted by KD0FRQ View Post
    I have a 90's vitage camero rear sway bar but it is far to wide for the stude frames.


    Tom

  11. #11
    Jeff -

    In your bar search...it's best to find as straight a bar as you can find. That is..one without a bunch of bends to clear this or that as it goes across the car.
    The reason, as the bar twists...a straight bar will for the most part, just twist. It will not try to knot up or bend.

    A bar that has a hand full of bends...will act "less" like an "torsion" bar and more like a semi-cooked piece of spaghetti.
    It will bend more than go thru a torsional twisting motion.

    Example....I'll bet NO ONE...has seen a Chrysler torsional front suspension with "any" bends in the torsion bars...! Unless of course...it's been crashed.
    Youll also never see a true race car with bends in their Anti-roll bars.

    I set up an early (69) Camaro/Firebird bar for my Lark wagon. At the time, there was a total of four different diameters to choose from to get the best out of the total combination.
    This is something "no one" has mentioned. To do this right...the springs, the front sway bar need to be accounted for when choosing the right diameter rear bar, or more correctly...both front and rear bar diameters. Be sure to increase the rear bar diameter (from ideal) if it has a bunch of clearance bends in it.

    Have fun

    Mike
    Last edited by Mike Van Veghten; 01-12-2011 at 04:26 PM.

  12. #12
    Golden Hawk Member DEEPNHOCK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brooklet, GA, USA. Planet Earth
    Posts
    17,505

    Thumbs up

    Interesting.... (Great minds think alike)
    In 1975, I stuck an early Firebird rear sway bar in my '61 Hawk.
    Sized it just under the stock front sway bar diameter.
    (New springs and shocks all around)
    Also added real 'Traction Master' traction bars.
    Made a huge difference
    It's all still setting out back behind the shop....waiting....just waiting....
    Jeff

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Van Veghten View Post
    <snip>
    I set up an early (69) Camaro/Firebird bar for my Lark wagon.
    At the time, there was a total of four different diameters to choose from to get the best out of the total combination.
    <snip>
    Have fun
    Mike

  13. #13
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Perris, Ca. & Seligman, Az USA.
    Posts
    4,892
    As Mike said, the size of the sway bars is critical. The rears are usually around 75% smaller than the front, such as the 60's Olds 442. That had a 1" front & I believe the rear was 3/4". I put one on my 68 Le Mans convertible years ago & it made a huge difference-but remember, the engineering was done already & not by me.
    59 Lark wagon, now V-8, H.D. auto!
    60 Lark convertible V-8 auto
    61 Champ 1/2 ton 4 speed
    62 Champ 3/4 ton 5 speed o/drive
    62 Daytona convertible V-8 4 speed & 62 Cruiser, auto.
    63 G.T. Hawk R-2,4 speed
    63 Avanti (2) R-1 auto
    64 Zip Van
    66 Daytona Sport Sedan(327)V-8 4 speed
    66 Cruiser V-8 auto

  14. #14
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lincoln, NE, USA.
    Posts
    798
    Had a chance to do a little research using an online auto mechanics database our local public library has and got some exploded views of a 1994 Ranger, a 1984 Jeep Cherokee and a 1990 Camaro rear sway bars.

    The 84 Ranger rear sway bar bolts onto the rear axle tubes with the bars arms facing forward, the link arms bolt up to the inner frame rails with the bar having a loop that goes over the body of the differential housing. From the illustration, the Ford frame is a C channel like the Champ or Transtar so this sway bar might work on the trucks depending clearence around the gas tank. This should work on a Lark as long as you can figure out how to fab up a suspension mount on the frame. Oh, the link arms look like the have big bushings and they have a bit of a jog to them too.

    The 1984 Cherokee rear sway bar looks like it bolts to the frame rail with links that connect the sway bar ends to a bracket bolted to the top of the rear springs via the outboard spring ubolts. I cannot tell from the pictures if this bar might possibly mount somewhere near the Studebaker location but I can do more research on the small jeeps.

    The 1990 (third gen) Camaro is bolted to the bottom of the axle tubes with brackets and ubolts Of the three swaybars the camaro bar looks to the the one with the fewest bends with stock links similar to the frame links on sway bars on the front suspensions of GM cars (bolt, grommets, spacers, washers) To use the camaro bar some sort of frame bracket will need to be made or adapt another link type to minimize welding if that is your desire.

    I have no idea of any of the sway bar diameters at this time but the research goes on

    If I can figure out how to post the illustrations that I have I will

    Jeff T.
    \"I\'m getting nowhere as fast as I can\"
    The Replacements.

  15. #15
    Silver Hawk Member JRoberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC, .
    Posts
    8,938
    All of this fabrication and adapting of existing parts is well and good, but is there a reason nobody has mentioned the sway bars sold by Dave Thibeault?
    Joe Roberts
    '61 R1 Champ
    '65 Cruiser
    Eastern North Carolina Chapter

  16. #16
    Silver Hawk Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA, USA.
    Posts
    7,540
    but is there a reason nobody has mentioned the sway bars sold by Dave Thibeault?
    Yes, that would be the easy and logical way to get a rear sway bar.

    No, some will take pride in not doing it the easy way. For the same reason CASOs don't drive Toyotas. That would be too easy and make too much logical sense. If we don't scrounge it from the scrap pile or the Pik'n-Pull, we don't feel we have done our duty to go boldly into the weird.

    Maybe, a few Stude owners also have a Toyota and obviously, Dave sells some sway bars. However, for many here, a different drummer, a music no one else hears, is the only way to dance.

    jack vines

    jack vines
    PackardV8

  17. #17
    President Member r1lark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
    Posts
    3,845
    Blog Entries
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by PackardV8 View Post
    Yes, that would be the easy and logical way to get a rear sway bar.

    No, some will take pride in not doing it the easy way. For the same reason CASOs don't drive Toyotas. That would be too easy and make too much logical sense. If we don't scrounge it from the scrap pile or the Pik'n-Pull, we don't feel we have done our duty to go boldly into the weird.

    Maybe, a few Stude owners also have a Toyota and obviously, Dave sells some sway bars. However, for many here, a different drummer, a music no one else hears, is the only way to dance.

    jack vines

    jack vines
    Jack,

    Very well put!!
    Paul
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Visit The Studebaker Skytop Registry website at: www.studebakerskytop.com

  18. #18
    President Member (S)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ferndale, Washington
    Posts
    1,534
    The most universal one I know of that does the job is on a mustang.

    Look up what others have to go through....... There are MANY other forums reinventing that wheel... https://6263meteor.proboards.com/inde...int&thread=521

    I'd look for one like this, but be sure you get any drop down links and hardware that came off the car.
    https://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/GT-re...-/220723002943
    Last edited by (S); 01-16-2011 at 07:31 PM.

  19. #19
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lincoln, NE, USA.
    Posts
    798
    Gee, I know T-bow sell full kits, so does SI...

    Time I have, cash is another matter entirely

    By the time I am able to doing something I may have the cash for the proper part

    If anything, I have discovered that the Ranger rear sway bar will work on my Champ project so my time invested was worth it.

    Jeff T.
    \"I\'m getting nowhere as fast as I can\"
    The Replacements.

  20. #20
    President Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, USA.
    Posts
    4,145
    Quote Originally Posted by PackardV8 View Post
    ...For the same reason CASOs don't drive Toyotas. That would be too easy and make too much logical sense.
    Logical sense to drive an over rated brand that drives more money and jobs overseas.
    "How would you use Toyota technology to make the world a better place?"



    "A terrible car crash in August of 2009 was the starting point for all of the Toyota recalls. Three family members along with relatives of a California Highway Patrol were killed and now Toyota Motor Corporation is being blamed for their deaths. John Saylor (off duty CHP), his wife, daughter, and brother-in-law died on August 28th, 2009. They were all in a 2009 Lexus ES350 when it took off at full speed, reaching 120 miles per hour in rush hour traffic in suburban San Diego, CA. The brother of Saylor’s wife called in the emergency and told the emergency dispatcher that the accelerator pedal was stuck and Saylor was unable to slow down. “We’re in trouble. . . . There’s no brakes. End freeway half-mile,” Christopher Lastrella said during the recorded conversation. Saylor, 45, his wife, Cleofe, daughter Mahala and Lastrella were killed instantly. Immediately after the crash Toyota recalled millions of cars for the same reason, sticking accelerator because of a floor mat jam. Toyota officials said they do not discuss the pending litigation."

    Floor mats? Its in the programing/design, its also not solved by relocated the gas pedal.
    They got off way too easy.

    Tom
    Last edited by sbca96; 01-17-2011 at 03:30 AM.

  21. #21
    President Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA, USA.
    Posts
    4,707
    My heart breaks for the passengers and innocents killed in this accident, but if the driver panics to the point of losing all common sense and can't figure out to put the car in neutral or turn off the key, I have little sympathy for him. Too many people have become complacent in driving their cars these days. It has always been and will always be a very serious business to take 2 tons of rolling death onto a highway and not have enough brains to know what to do if your throttle sticks. I always drive with the idea that somewhere around me is some nut-burger who is not paying full attention. It has saved me from many accidents through my 40 years of driving.
    sals54

  22. #22
    President Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, USA.
    Posts
    4,145
    Quote Originally Posted by sals54 View Post
    My heart breaks for the passengers and innocents killed in this accident, but if the driver panics to the point of losing all common sense and can't figure out to put the car in neutral or turn off the key, I have little sympathy for him. Too many people have become complacent in driving their cars these days. It has always been and will always be a very serious business to take 2 tons of rolling death onto a highway and not have enough brains to know what to do if your throttle sticks. I always drive with the idea that somewhere around me is some nut-burger who is not paying full attention. It has saved me from many accidents through my 40 years of driving.
    First off the guy was an off duty CHP officer, so my guess is he had more training in
    driving a vehicle than most of us. Secondly, a Lexus has no "key" - it is a button that
    must be depressed for a number of seconds to shut the engine down. The car was
    borrowed so its doubtful that he read the entire owners manual prior to setting out,
    as a matter of fact, I bet most Lexus owners still dont know this. As the woman who
    testified when her Toyota did the same thing: the car can not be put into Neutral. The
    computer overrides the shift to avoid damage to the engine by over revving. A shift to
    Reverse, same thing, overridden, shift to park finally worked apparently when she'd
    got the car under a certain speed by a wing and a prayer.

    GM cars are designed to default to idle when a DBW failure is detected, apparently a
    Toyota defaults to WOT or as a University teacher proved : doesnt detect a failure at
    all. Times have changed, many of todays cars are designed to protect the warranty
    over you life. Toyota did an excellent job of sweeping this under the mat, while the
    American public made excuses for them and blamed those that died. It is so very sad.

    Tom

  23. #23
    Golden Hawk Member DEEPNHOCK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brooklet, GA, USA. Planet Earth
    Posts
    17,505
    As posted in the original bash Toyota thread...
    Be real careful about pointing fingers of blame about this.
    That pedal was built in Indiana by Americans. It was also used by Ford in vehicles exported to China.
    There is/was a single feedback data loop built into it's circuit board.
    That data stream has a redundant path built into it on other styles of pedals in 'drive by wire' engine controlled automobiles.
    This (dual path data stream) was a requirement from other marques engineers.
    Seems if the data stream was 'lost', the throttle position sensor would go wide open.
    I have not followed this in months, but do know the vocal media sure made a target of one company/competitor.
    Blame the fuel pedal design, or the management reaction to a problem, sure....
    But even then, who were the engineers? American engineers employed by Toyota? I don't know.
    Who were the managers that made these decisions? American corporate managers and lawyers? I don't know.
    Was our media hot to bring this all out at a time when our manufacturers of cars were hurting?
    Were a lot of the runaway incidents later proven false by data stream recordings?
    Lot's of questions, and not a lot of answers.
    That professor you mentioned hot-wired the circuit to produce that fault, and did it for media exposure.
    He did not point out the circuit design flaw fault. He created one for TV.
    But...Toyota is ultimately to blame, because it was their vehicle had an anomaly.
    How they handled it was poor, at best.
    But they are not the only company to address problems like this.
    Remember the Toyota spare tires falling out of the trucks, because of frame rust?
    That was heaped into the 'pile on Toyota' bandwagon during the same time as the gas pedal incident.
    Who ended up taking the blame for that?
    Dana did, as the stamping company that made the frames.
    Were they wrong? Or did they stamp and coat/plate/paint to Toyota spec's?
    The fickle public pointing fingers is nothing new.
    People want someone, or something to blame when death and injury are a result of poor design.
    I just would like to see people be careful pointing the blame gun.
    It's easy to point it at an offshore owner.
    Sometimes, we Americans could be in the sights if we made the part, or built the car here...

    Quote Originally Posted by sbca96 View Post
    First off the guy was an off duty CHP officer, so my guess is he had more training in
    driving a vehicle than most of us. Secondly, a Lexus has no "key" - it is a button that
    must be depressed for a number of seconds to shut the engine down. The car was
    borrowed so its doubtful that he read the entire owners manual prior to setting out,
    as a matter of fact, I bet most Lexus owners still dont know this. As the woman who
    testified when her Toyota did the same thing: the car can not be put into Neutral. The
    computer overrides the shift to avoid damage to the engine by over revving. A shift to
    Reverse, same thing, overridden, shift to park finally worked apparently when she'd
    got the car under a certain speed by a wing and a prayer.

    GM cars are designed to default to idle when a DBW failure is detected, apparently a
    Toyota defaults to WOT or as a University teacher proved : doesnt detect a failure at
    all. Times have changed, many of todays cars are designed to protect the warranty
    over you life. Toyota did an excellent job of sweeping this under the mat, while the
    American public made excuses for them and blamed those that died. It is so very sad.

    Tom

  24. #24
    President Member r1lark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
    Posts
    3,845
    Blog Entries
    36
    Whoa, this has gotten way off topic.

    Anyone have pictures of rear sway bars that they have successfully adapted to a Lark?
    Paul
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Visit The Studebaker Skytop Registry website at: www.studebakerskytop.com

  25. #25
    President Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, USA.
    Posts
    4,145
    Quote Originally Posted by DEEPNHOCK View Post
    That pedal was built in Indiana by Americans..... snip ... Sometimes, we Americans could be in the sights if we made the part, or built the car here...
    Not in todays market, working in the manufacturing field I can tell you this, junk
    in junk out. The parts are made to the print, if the print is wrong the part is also
    wrong. If the part is made wrong, and not to the print, it should be caught by a
    QA or QC department, as they are required to test a certain number per batch.

    I only brought this up because Toyota was mentioned as a logical choice of car
    to buy. Concidering that most modern Chevys and Fords rate higher, its time we
    stop spreading this lie, and continuing to destroy our economy. This is real folks.









    I saw a bumper sticker on a KIA the other day that said, "Keep jobs in US".

    Tom

  26. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by sbca96 View Post
    I only brought this up because Toyota was mentioned as a logical choice of car
    to buy. Concidering that most modern Chevys and Fords rate higher, its time we
    stop spreading this lie, and continuing to destroy our economy. This is real folks.
    "lie" is a harsh word. truth is all mfgrs. have lots of quality issues. Just had a $500 shifter assembly replaced on my 3 year old Impala because the key would no longer come out of the ignition. Fleet lady said that this wasn't the first time that had happened. (small pool, maybe 5 Impalas in it.) Also had to have a door lock repaired at something like only 40K miles, and I KNOW that is a common problem because not only was I told so by mechanic but I had to run a coworker to dealership to have same problem fixed. Also have had two alignments done, rotors turned once (they're warped again) and both front wheel bearings replaced already. Personally I don't know who makes a really "good" trouble free car anymore. I used to really like VW but they do have their own issues, although I think their mechanicals are stronger than everyone else's.

    I am not a big GM fan after having had two alignments on the Imp in less than 50K miles. I don't think the car will ever drive right, but then again I will probably buy it anyway, because like I said, I don't know that Ford or Toyota are much better, and I've been paying extra to use synthetic fluids, have trans serviced at "severe service" interval, etc. so hopefully it will last for 200K miles or more even though I don't really like it.

    The difference between the problems that I've had and the problems with Toyotas are just that the Toyota problems have safety implications. However, Toyota dealerships tend to have a better reputation than any for rectifying problems without a lot of yelling and threatening.

    I think pretty much all auto mfgrs. make a lot of decisions that are based on financial considerations and not making the best product that they can, sadly.

    nate
    --
    55 Commander Starlight
    https://members.cox.net/njnagel

  27. #27
    President Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Glendora, California, USA.
    Posts
    1,460
    I know this is late but I used the front and rear from a 85/6 firebird and bent the eas of the rear bar in a few inches and it feels like it handles better that my 3 series BMW.
    This is the rear. https://plus.google.com/photos/11667...55889877658705
    This is the front. https://plus.google.com/photos/11667...89296114667409
    Since then I have added and extra leaf at the back and swapped the front coils for some Moog variable rate CC655's.
    Last edited by Skybolt; 03-29-2014 at 06:02 PM. Reason: Updated 3/29/2014 as Webshots photos were inaccessible they are now on Picasa.

  28. #28
    Speedster Member Bradford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Sanford NC
    Posts
    134
    Quote Originally Posted by Skybolt View Post
    I know this is late but I used the front and rear from a 85/6 firebird and bent the eas of the rear bar in a few inches and it feels like it handles better that my 3 series BMW.
    This is the rear. https://plus.google.com/photos/11667...55889877658705
    This is the front. https://plus.google.com/photos/11667...89296114667409
    Since then I have added and extra leaf at the back and swapped the front coils for some Moog variable rate CC655's.
    Just to clarify, you are using these on what model Lark?

  29. #29
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Perris, Ca. & Seligman, Az USA.
    Posts
    4,892
    It doesn't matter Bradford. All Larks have the same frame & suspension design. Hawks too for that matter. Only the Avanti has a different sway bar setup due to the fuel tank being in another location & not bolted to the frame as in the others.
    59 Lark wagon, now V-8, H.D. auto!
    60 Lark convertible V-8 auto
    61 Champ 1/2 ton 4 speed
    62 Champ 3/4 ton 5 speed o/drive
    62 Daytona convertible V-8 4 speed & 62 Cruiser, auto.
    63 G.T. Hawk R-2,4 speed
    63 Avanti (2) R-1 auto
    64 Zip Van
    66 Daytona Sport Sedan(327)V-8 4 speed
    66 Cruiser V-8 auto

  30. #30
    President Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Glendora, California, USA.
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Bradford View Post
    Just to clarify, you are using these on what model Lark?
    I don't think it matters much, but it's a 59 Lark.

    Len

  31. #31
    President Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Perris, Ca. & Seligman, Az USA.
    Posts
    4,892
    Quote Originally Posted by Skybolt View Post
    I know this is late but I used the front and rear from a 85/6 firebird and bent the eas of the rear bar in a few inches and it feels like it handles better that my 3 series BMW.
    This is the rear. https://plus.google.com/photos/11667...55889877658705
    This is the front. https://plus.google.com/photos/11667...89296114667409
    Since then I have added and extra leaf at the back and swapped the front coils for some Moog variable rate CC655's.
    Len, thanks for the great pictures but they raise a question with me. In them it looks like the left side mounts above the lower control arm while the right looks to mount below the control arm. Why? Or am I looking at the photos wrong?
    59 Lark wagon, now V-8, H.D. auto!
    60 Lark convertible V-8 auto
    61 Champ 1/2 ton 4 speed
    62 Champ 3/4 ton 5 speed o/drive
    62 Daytona convertible V-8 4 speed & 62 Cruiser, auto.
    63 G.T. Hawk R-2,4 speed
    63 Avanti (2) R-1 auto
    64 Zip Van
    66 Daytona Sport Sedan(327)V-8 4 speed
    66 Cruiser V-8 auto

  32. #32
    President Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Glendora, California, USA.
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Webb View Post
    Len, thanks for the great pictures but they raise a question with me. In them it looks like the left side mounts above the lower control arm while the right looks to mount below the control arm. Why? Or am I looking at the photos wrong?
    I tried both. If you search through the photos you will find a shot of each side with the mounting of both above and below the control arm. I even flipped the bar over to see if I could get a better angle for the outer ends but having them below seems to work well enough and as I don't travel on rocky ground the clearance is not a concern.

    I think the complete set is mixed up with all the other albums. I will look tonight and see if they can be sorted better.

    Correction, photo 4 and 7, and photo 12 and 13, show the mounting below and above respectively.

    Len

  33. #33
    President Member Studeous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Middle, TN USA.
    Posts
    560
    I recently pulled a front sway bar off of a 1985 Parisienne (same as Caprice). I think the measurements are identical to that 84 Olds midsize front bar.
    My 1st car. "A TRANSTAR"
    53 Champion Starlight
    53-55 Starliner For Sale or Trade

    Somewhere between Culture and Agriculture
    in the Geographic center of Tennessee

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •